THE SKY IS FALLING; GLOBAL WARMING AND THE GREEN HOUSE EFFECT
USA TODAY's Dan Vergano reported Monday, the National Academy of Sciences and 10 other leading world bodies said there is "significant global warming" that requires urgent action.
For every scientific report trying to support the global warming/green house theory, (that’s right it is just a theory) there is another report with just as much evidence disproving it. There is no doubt that global temperatures are changing, ice caps are melting and seas are rising.
The issue is not whether the Earth is undergoing significant climate changes, rather the issue is who or what is causing them.
I’m not a scientist by any stretch of the imagination, however, from the data that I have read and the research I have seen on both sides of this issue, there’s not enough evidence to support either view one way or the other. For example, the earliest recorded weather temperatures we have date back to the 1800’s. In order to understand how climate changes, one would need to create a rolling average of fluctuating temperatures that date back a lot further than 100 to 200 years ago.
How can we determine if the climate changes are normal or abnormal with out a complete history? If the green house effect is real and is the cause of global warming, then why do most scientists agree the Earth has experienced significant climate changes in the past? What was the cause of those fluctuations in temperatures? My belief is that from the beginning of time till now there has been a wide gamut of temperatures and it is perfectly normal. The Earth is on a fluctuating cycle that will repeat it’s self over and over again.


AddMe.com, Search Engine Marketing
Blog Search Engine
1 Comments:
There is currently more evidence in support of global warming than there was in 1985 that smoking caused lung cancer. Get your head out of the sand. What is the harm in admitting the scientists are correct?
Post a Comment
<< Home